B-228233.2: Dec 8, 1988

A firm protested an Army contract award for interactive course design and development, contending that the: (1) Army improperly omitted certain requirements from the initial solicitation; (2) solicitation licensing and nondisclosure requirements were unduly restrictive; (3) Army improperly allowed the solicitation's acceptance period to expire before requesting extensions; (4) Army improperly dela...

B-228233.2: Dec 8, 1988

(2) restrictive provisions were added to solicitation. (3) proposal acceptance periods had expired and (4) procurement was repeatedly delayed by requests for best and final offers and proposal acceptance period extensions. Are dismissed as untimely when protester competes under solicitation without objection and files protest after award. Protest that agency improperly evaluated proposals is denie...