B-228015,B-228015.2:
Dec 7, 1987
A firm protested an Army contractor's subcontract award for multipurpose demilitarization machines, contending that: (1) its proposal was technically acceptable; (2) the contractor improperly evaluated its proposal; and (3) the contractor improperly increased its labor hours. In addition, the protester requested reimbursement for its bid preparation costs. The Army contended that: (1) the proteste...