B-227642.3:
Nov 25, 1987
A firm protested an Army solicitation for an intrusion detection system, contending that the: (1) radio frequency requirements unduly restricted competition; and (2) Army overstated its minimum needs. GAO held that the: (1) protester failed to show that the Army's requirements were unreasonable or that they exceeded its minimum needs; and (2) protester's mere disagreement with the Army did not inv...