B-227642.3: Nov 25, 1987

A firm protested an Army solicitation for an intrusion detection system, contending that the: (1) radio frequency requirements unduly restricted competition; and (2) Army overstated its minimum needs. GAO held that the: (1) protester failed to show that the Army's requirements were unreasonable or that they exceeded its minimum needs; and (2) protester's mere disagreement with the Army did not inv...

B-227642.3: Nov 25, 1987

PROCUREMENT - Specifications - Minimum Needs Standards - Competitive Restrictions - Allegation Substantiation - Evidence - Sufficiency DIGEST: Protest alleging that solicitation's specifications for radio communication intrusion detection system are excessive and unduly restrictive of competition is denied where protester merely disagrees with agency's determination of its minimum needs and fails...