B-227140: Sep 8, 1987

A firm protested an amendment to the evaluation criteria of a Navy solicitation for the modernization of attack consoles, contending that the amendment did not allow offerers sufficient time to revise proposals. GAO held that: (1) the protester failed to show that offerers required more time than the amendment allowed to revise proposals; and (2) since the protester's initial proposal did not rece...

B-227140: Sep 8, 1987

Was not unreasonable where it is not shown that additional time was needed to revise proposals. Singer contends that the time period between issuance of an amendment modifying the relative weights of the evaluation criteria and the due date for best and final offers (BAFOs) was insufficient to allow the revision of its proposal to accommodate the substantial changes to the evaluation criteria. Sel...