B-226714:
Jun 17, 1987
A firm protested an Army contract award to another firm for architect-engineering services, contending that: (1) the Army improperly evaluated the proposals using unspecified evaluation criteria; and (2) it was more qualified than the awardee. GAO held that: (1) the solicitation specified the evaluation factors that the Army used; and (2) there was no evidence that the Army's evaluation and rankin...