B-225451.2,B-225451.3: Apr 28, 1987

A firm protested a Navy contract award for computer hardware and services, contending that the Navy: (1) improperly amended the solicitation to delete a test requirement, to the awardee's sole benefit; (2) engaged in improper technical leveling; (3) disclosed the bid price to the awardee; and (4) improperly entered into certain agreements during negotiations with the awardee regarding delivery ter...

B-225451.2,B-225451.3: Apr 28, 1987

ENTERED INTO CERTAIN AGREEMENTS ONLY WITH AWARDEE IS DENIED. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF IMPROPER TECHNICAL TRANSFUSION. PROTESTER'S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION IS DISMISSED AS ACADEMIC WHERE ALL ISSUES ADDRESSED IN THE EARLIER DECISION. WHICH IS SUBJECT OF RECONSIDERATION REQUEST. HAVE BEEN DEALT WITH AT LENGTH ON THE BASIS OF AN EXPANDED RECORD IN THE PRESENT DECISION DENYING THE P...