B-225419.3,B-228095: Aug 25, 1987

A firm protested the Defense Logistics Agency's (DLA) acceptance of another firm's bid for shower assemblies, contending that: (1) the awardee's prices reflected predatory price-cutting, in violation of antitrust laws; (2) the awardee was nonresponsible, since it lacked business integrity; and (3) the awardee's product did not meet solicitation specifications. GAO held that: (1) the protester shou...

B-225419.3,B-228095: Aug 25, 1987

General Accounting Office will not review a contracting agency's decision that a firm is responsible except in limited circumstances. Whether or not a firm actually performs in compliance with contract requirements is a matter of contract administration. The solicitations are for two separate requirements for shower assemblies. Are appropriate for resolution by the Department of Justice. We will n...