B-225419.3,B-228095:
Aug 25, 1987
A firm protested the Defense Logistics Agency's (DLA) acceptance of another firm's bid for shower assemblies, contending that: (1) the awardee's prices reflected predatory price-cutting, in violation of antitrust laws; (2) the awardee was nonresponsible, since it lacked business integrity; and (3) the awardee's product did not meet solicitation specifications. GAO held that: (1) the protester shou...