https://www.gao.gov/products/131525

B-223938,B-224504: Nov 3, 1986

A firm protested the Navy's rejection of its bid under a small business set-aside for technical support services, contending that the Navy: (1) improperly evaluated its proposal based on undisclosed criteria; (2) should have conducted negotiations with it concerning its proposal deficiencies; (3) improperly cancelled the solicitation; and (4) should reinstate the solicitation. GAO held that the Na...

https://www.gao.gov/products/406920

B-223938,B-224504: Nov 3, 1986

WHICH CONCLUDED THAT THE PROTESTER'S PROPOSAL WAS TECHNICALLY UNACCEPTABLE. SHOWS THAT EVALUATION WAS REASONABLY AND CONSISTENT WITH SOLICITATION'S EVALUATION SCHEME. THE GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WILL DENY THE PROTEST. AGENCY'S USE OF EVALUATION SUBFACTORS SUCH AS RECENTNESS OF EXPERIENCE IS PROPER WHEN THE SUBFACTORS ARE REASONABLE RELATED TO OR ENCOMPASSED BY STATED EVALUATION CRITERIA. IS NOT...