B-223821:
Aug 21, 1986
A firm protested the Army's rejection of its bid as nonresponsive, contending that: (1) its bid was responsive since it provided a post-bid-opening explanation stating that it misinterpreted a solicitation provision requirement that all end items be supplied by a small business concern; and (2) the specifications were defective. GAO held that: (1) the Army properly determined bid responsiveness fr...