B-222731: Apr 17, 1986

A firm protested the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) termination of its mail sorting services contract, contending that IRS: (1) improperly terminated the contract so that it could have agency personnel perform the services; and (2) was required to conduct a cost comparison before terminating the contract. GAO held that: (1) it would not consider whether IRS improperly decided to use agency perso...

B-222731: Apr 17, 1986

THE GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WILL NOT REVIEW AN AGENCY DECISION TO PERFORM WORK IN-HOUSE RATHER THAN TO CONTINUE TO CONTRACT FOR THE SERVICES WHERE NO COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION WAS ISSUED PURSUANT TO OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. PROTEST AGAINST TERMINATION OF A CONTRACT IS DISMISSED BECAUSE OF TERMINATIONS FOR CONVENIENCE ARE. MATTERS OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND ARE NOT REVIEWAB...