B-221980.2: May 28, 1986

A firm requested reconsideration of its protest against a Defense Logistics Agency contract award for static dischargers, which GAO dismissed as untimely because the protester did not file it before bid opening. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that: (1) the government requirements could include some for which it had not approved the awardee's product; (2) the requiremen...

B-221980.2: May 28, 1986

DECISION IS AFFIRMED ON RECONSIDERATION WHERE PROTESTER RAISES NO NEW FACTS OR LEGAL ARGUMENTS THAT WERE NOT CONSIDERED. UNTIMELY PROTEST WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED UNDER EXCEPTION OF TIMELINESS RULES FOR A PROTEST THAT RAISES A SIGNIFICANT ISSUE WHERE THE ISSUE IS NOT OF GENERAL INTEREST TO THE PROCUREMENT COMMUNITY AND PREVIOUSLY HAS BEEN ADDRESSED BY THIS OFFICE. WE DISMISSED THE PROTEST OF THESE A...