B-221304:
Mar 10, 1986
A firm protested an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contract for pathology support services, contending that: (1) its proposal was technically superior to the awardee's; (2) EPA failed to evaluate the cost of travel to the place of performance; (3) EPA did not include outside experts in its technical evaluation panel; and (4) the awardee's proposed costs were not realistic. GAO held that: (1...