B-220385:
Jan 29, 1986
A firm protested an Army contract award for system operation and maintenance support services, contending that: (1) the evaluation was unfair because one of the evaluators was not present when the second best and final offers were evaluated; and (2) the Army's decision to award the contract to a higher-cost bidder was not justified. GAO held that: (1) there was no basis to conclude that the evalua...