B-219389.2:
Oct 31, 1985
A firm protested an Army cost-plus-fixed-fee contract award, contending that: (1) its proposal was improperly evaluated and downgraded for cost realism and for lack of design engineering capability which was not required; (2) the solicitation misled offerers by not disclosing the precise numerical weights to be used; and (3) because the awardee was not the lowest cost, technically qualified offere...