B-219365,B-219368:
Sep 4, 1985
A firm protested two Navy contract awards, contending that: (1) the specifications in both solicitations were unduly restrictive; (2) the Navy improperly used brand name or equal specifications in the one solicitation; and (3) the other solicitation overstated the Navy's minimum needs. The Navy argued that the protests were untimely because they concerned allegedly defective specifications which m...