B-219341:
Aug 29, 1985
A firm protested an Army contract award, contending that: (1) the solicitation specifications included unique attributes of a product it offered in a previous unsolicited proposal; and (2) the Army improperly appropriated and disclosed proprietary data from that proposal. The Army argued that: (1) no proprietary information contained in the proposal was disclosed; and (2) the proposal had no impac...