B-217459: May 24, 1985

A firm protested the Army's classification of work under a solicitation for military housing maintenance as falling within either the Davis-Bacon Act (DBA) or the Service Contract Act (SCA) minimum wage requirements and the Army's inclusion of both DBA and SCA covered items under the same solicitation. The protester was the incumbent contractor on a prior contract originally covered by the SCA whi...

B-217459: May 24, 1985

ARE NOT BASED ON THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE. BURDEN IS NOT SUSTAINED WHERE PROTESTER HAS NOT REFUTED AGENCY STATEMENT THAT IT RELIED ON EXPERIENCE UNDER PRIOR CONTRACT. THE IFB WAS ISSUED BY THE ARMY. THIS PROCUREMENT IS THE SUCCESSOR TO A PRIOR CONTRACT FOR SIMILAR SERVICES ON WHICH YAMAS IS THE INCUMBENT. THE PROTEST IS DENIED. WAS MODIFIED BY THE ARMY TO PROVIDE DBA COVERAGE PURSUANT TO A M...