B-217231.2: May 30, 1985

A firm requested reconsideration of a decision which dismissed as untimely its protest of an Army contract award. The protest was dismissed because it was filed more than 10 working days after the protester was notified of adverse agency action; however, the Army and the protester reported that an error in the protest resulted in the use of an incorrect date of notice and, therefore, GAO found tha...

B-217231.2: May 30, 1985

GAO WILL NOT SUBSTITUTE ITS JUDGMENT FOR THAT OF AGENCY EVALUATORS CONCERNING TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF PROTESTER'S PROPOSAL WHERE IN CAMERA REVIEW OF SOURCE SELECTION DOCUMENTS SHOWS THAT EVALUATION WAS FAIR AND REASONABLE AND CONSISTENT WITH EVALUATION CRITERIA IN THE SOLICITATION. HIGHER TECHNICALLY RATED OFFEROR AS LONG AS THE DECISION TO DO SO IS REASONABLE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATED EVA...