[Request for Reconsideration of Decision Concerning Alleged Deficiencies in GSA Cost Comparison]

B-216315.2: Dec 4, 1984

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm requested reconsideration of a decision in which GAO dismissed its protest of alleged deficiencies in a General Services Administration (GSA) cost comparison, because the protester failed to first exhaust available administrative review procedures. The protester contended that the requirement was not applicable since GSA had no administrative review procedures. GAO found that the solicitation contained a provision that set forth appeal procedures and, since the protester did not file an appeal pursuant to that provision, the protester failed to exhaust available review procedures. Accordingly, the prior decision was affirmed.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here