B-215391:
Oct 30, 1984
A firm protested the inclusion of two clauses in a General Services Administration (GSA) procurement, arguing that: (1) the first was arbitrary and unjust because it made false assumptions; and (2) the second included an impermissible penalty for work omitted or unsatisfactorily performed. GAO held that GSA provided a reasonable explanation for its assumptions in the first clause and that the prot...