B-214751.2: Dec 3, 1984

A firm protested the award of any contract under a request for proposals (RFP) issued by the Navy, contending that: (1) it was denied an opportunity to reply to the RFP because the synopsis of the procurement was misclassified in the Commerce Business Daily (CBD) and its copy of the RFP was mailed to the wrong address; (2) the Navy may have intentionally misclassified the CBD synopsis to prevent t...

B-214751.2: Dec 3, 1984

(4) IS NOT SHOWN TO HAVE PURPOSELY PRECLUDED THE PROTESTER FROM COMPETING. A PROTESTER'S SPECULATION THAT THE AGENCY MAY HAVE SOUGHT TO PREVENT IT FROM COMPETING BY MISCLASSIFYING A PROCUREMENT NOTICE AND NOT MAILING IT A SOLICITATION IS NOT SUFFICIENT WHERE THE ONLY EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD SHOWS THAT THE MISCLASSIFICATION WAS INADVERTENT AND THAT THE AGENCY ACTUALLY MAILED THE PROTESTER A COPY OF...