B-214171:
Jan 22, 1985
A firm protested an Army contract award, arguing that the Army's technical evaluation incorrectly determined its bid to be equal to another bidder's. That bidder received the award because it had a lower proposed cost. The protester also argued that the Army did not conduct a proper cost realism analysis of the awardee's bid. GAO held that, since the protester failed to provide evidence showing th...