B-213060.2:
Jul 23, 1984
A firm requested reconsideration of a decision which denied its protest of a Navy invitation for bids (IFB) that limited the materials to be used and excluded its product. GAO held that the contracting agency was primarily responsible for determining its minimum needs, and the protester failed to affirmatively prove its case that the IFB was unduly restrictive of competition. The protester contend...