B-211788.2: Nov 16, 1983

A firm requested reconsideration of a decision that denied its protest of a proposed Army contract award. The protester contended that the Army's acceptance of a correction to the awardee's worksheets displaced the protester as the low bidder. The protester's position was that: (1) the evaluative process for determining the lowest bid should be the totals reached from extension of unit prices; and...

B-211788.2: Nov 16, 1983

DIGEST: REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED WHERE THE PROTESTER MERELY REARGUES THE SAME POINTS THAT WERE PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INITIAL PROTEST. WHICH WAS REFLECTED IN THE FIRM'S TOTAL BID FOR ALL ITEMS. WHOSE ENTERED TOTAL BID WAS LOW. MARINE WAYS' POSITION WAS THAT IN VIEW OF THE SOLICITATION'S PRESUMPTION IN FAVOR OF UNIT PRICES WHERE THERE ARE DISCREPANT EXTENDED PR...