B-210376.2: Jul 31, 1984

A firm requested reconsideration of a decision which denied its protest that the Army improperly cancelled a solicitation after performing a cost comparison to determine whether a contract should be awarded for required services. The protester contended that: (1) the Army improperly included overtime work in the solicitation that actually represented backlog work, thus misleading the protester int...

B-210376.2: Jul 31, 1984

NEW ISSUE RAISED IN REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY BECAUSE THE ISSUE IS BASED ON INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE AGENCY REPORT ON THE ORIGINAL PROTEST. WAS NOT RAISED WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE REPORT. ALTHOUGH IT WAS UNCLEAR THAT A QUANTITY ESTIMATE IN THE SOLICITATION COVERED TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF WORK. PROTESTER ONLY INCLUDED THE ACTUAL TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANT...