B-210368.2: Aug 23, 1983

A firm protested a contract award under an Air Force resolicitation for cameras. The protester had been awarded the contract under the original solicitation. However, that contract was terminated because another offerer had not received a specification amendment. The protester argued that the awardee obtained a competitive advantage in the resolicitation because the Air Force had released the cont...

B-210368.2: Aug 23, 1983

PROTEST THAT PROCURING AGENCY IMPROPERLY RELEASED PRICE AND TECHNICAL DATA OF PROTESTER'S TERMINATED CONTRACT TO COMPETITORS IS UNTIMELY WHEN NOT FILED PRIOR TO CLOSING DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS ON RESOLICITATION FOLLOWING TERMINATION. 2. GAO WILL NOT REVIEW A DECISION NOT TO CONDUCT A PREAWARD SURVEY. BELOW COST PROPOSAL PROVIDES NO BASIS FOR PROTEST BECAUSE PROCURING AGENCY DETERMINED THAT F...