B-210342,B-210347: Feb 16, 1983

A firm protested a Service Contract Act wage determination incorporated into Navy solicitations for custodial services. The protester, who was the incumbent contractor, complained that the wage determination issued by the Department of Labor was inconsistent with the collective bargaining agreement covering the employees involved. The protester also alleged that the wage determination would result...

B-210342,B-210347: Feb 16, 1983

INCUMBENT CONTRACTOR WHICH PREPARED BIDS BASED ON A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT WITH ITS EMPLOYEES WAS NOT PREJUDICED BY INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WAGE DETERMINATION IN THE SOLICITATIONS AND THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT. COMPLAINS THAT THE WAGE DETERMINATION ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT COVERING...