https://www.gao.gov/products/439848

B-210259: Sep 2, 1983

IS TIMELY FILED WHEN FILED 10 WORKING DAYS AFTER AWARD UNDER SEEMINGLY UNAMBIGUOUS RFP. 3. PROTESTER'S ALLEGATION THAT RFP IS AMBIGUOUS IS WITHOUT MERIT BECAUSE RFP IS NOT SUBJECT TO TWO REASONABLE INTERPRETATIONS. 4. WHERE PROTESTER DISAGREES WITH PROCURING AGENCY'S TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF SUCCESSFUL PROPOSAL VIS-A-VIS ITS PROPOSAL WITHOUT PRODUCING SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO ESTABLISH EVALUATION WAS...

https://www.gao.gov/products/122268

B-210259: Sep 2, 1983

A firm protested the award of a contract to another firm for 200 manufactured/factory-built housing units under a request for proposals (RFP) issued by the Army Corps of Engineers. The protester contended that the awardee's proposal failed to conform to the requirements of the RFP. The agency argued that: (1) the awardee's proposal did conform to the RFP; (2) the relative merits of the awardee's p...