The report you requested was not found, or there is more than one product with this report number. Please select from this list of similar report numbers.


B-208715, AUG 16, 1983, OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

B-208715: Aug 16, 1983

ATTORNEY AT LAW - ABOGADO: THIS IS IN RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER OF JUNE 20. WAS NOT A FORMAL DECISION BY THIS OFFICE AND. "THE PRESENTMENT OF A CLAIM TO AND A DECISION BY THE GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE IS NOT A PREREQUISITE TO SUIT AND DOES NOT TOLL THE RUNNING OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.". WE WILL NEED TO SECURE A FULL ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONCERNING THE CLAIM GENE...

B-208715, MAY 10, 1984

B-208715: May 10, 1984

EMPLOYEES IN PANAMA IS AUTHORIZED UNDER PANAMA CANAL ACT OF 1979. CLAIM IS DENIED SINCE THESE EMPLOYEES HAVE NO ENTITLEMENT TO PAY BASED ON GENERAL SCHEDULE RATES. BACKGROUND THIS DECISION IS IN RESPONSE TO A CLAIM FILED BY ALBERT J. WHO ARE UNITED STATES CITIZENS EMPLOYED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) IN PANAMA. ARE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION BASED ON GENERAL SCHEDULE RATES. JOYCE ARGUES THAT...

[Claims Under Panama Area Wage Base]

B-208715: May 10, 1984

A claim was filed on behalf of 61 Department of Defense (DOD) employees who work in Panama, contending that these employees are entitled to compensation based on General Schedule rates rather than the Panama Area Wage Base which is a much lower rate of pay for equivalent positions. It was contended that DOD unilaterally decided to adopt the Panama Area Wage Base, which affects compensation as well...