B-204557:
Sep 21, 1981
A firm protested the Army's award of a contract for noncarbonated fruit drink beverages and dispensing equipment to another company. The protester argued that the awardee's bid was nonresponsive because neither the drinks nor the dispensing equipment that the awardee proposed to supply met the invitation for bids (IFB) specifications. The protester further argued that the contracting officer was r...