https://www.gao.gov/products/116658

B-203579.2: Oct 19, 1981

A firm requested reconsideration of a GAO decision which dismissed as untimely its protest against a solicitation cancellation and a resolicitation. The protest was dismissed as untimely because it was filed after the bid opening on the resolicitation. The protester contended that the protest was timely because the changes in the resolicitation required no change in cost and that it was not appare...

https://www.gao.gov/products/458057

B-203579.2: Oct 19, 1981

DIGEST: PRIOR DECISION DISMISSING PROTEST AS UNTIMELY IS AFFIRMED SINCE IT IS NOT SHOWN TO HAVE BEEN BASED ON ERROR OF LAW OR FACT. WE DISMISSED CARROLL'S PROTEST AS UNTIMELY BECAUSE IT WAS FILED AFTER THE BID OPENING ON THE RESOLICITATION. CARROLL ADMITS "THE CANCELLATION WAS IN ACCORD WITH BOTH THE PROCUREMENT REGULATIONS AND THE VARIOUS RULINGS OF THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL.". CARROLL'S REQUEST FO...