Protest of Rejection of Bid as Nonresponsive

B-203212: Mar 1, 1982

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested the Army's rejection of its bid for pneumatic aircraft tires as nonresponsive. The Army determination was based on the protester's exclusion of Federal Excise Tax (FET) from its bid price. The protester contended that it properly excluded the FET from its bid price, because the tax does not apply to tires procured for military aircraft. The solicitation specifically stated that, unless it was otherwise provided in the contract, the contract price included all applicable taxes. Regulations concerning the FET state that military aircraft are only exempt from excise under certain conditions: the purchase must be substantial, the contracting officer must determine at the time of purchase that the supplies are intended for use on military aircraft, and the administrative burden of insuring that the supplies are used for exempt purposes must not make the use of exemption uneconomical. As a result of these conditions, the contractor cannot be assured that an exemption certificate will be issued, and the contractor, therefore, may have to pay the FET. Since there was no assurance that the FET would not have to be paid, GAO believed that the case fell within the rule that where tax is of doubtful applicability and a bidder states in its bid that it is not including the tax, the bidder must specify the tax and the amount excluded. The protester's bid did not indicate the tax which was excluded from the bid price. Therefore, GAO determined that the protester's bid was properly rejected as nonresponsive. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here