B-195550.3:
Apr 6, 1981
(THE OPTION IN ISSUE THERE WAS THE FIRST OF A SERIES IN THE NAVY-MTL CONTRACT. THE ONE IN ISSUE HERE IS THE SECOND.). WE HELD THAT THE UNIONS WERE NOT INTERESTED PARTIES FOR PURPOSES OF PROTESTING THE NAVY'S DECISION TO EXERCISE THE OPTION. WE ALSO SPECIFICALLY ADVISED THAT THE ENFORECEMENT OF THE SERVICE CONTRACT ACT OF 1965 IS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. WE WILL NOT CONSI...
