Although a previous decision affirmed the disallowance of an entire claim of a wage grade employee for temporary promotion and backpay for a detail to a higher-grade position from January 1974 to August 1975, the claim for the period from December 8, 1974, to July 3, 1975, was allowed. New evidence indicated that the employee had one continuous detail from December 8, 1974, through February 28, 19...

A Federal employee requested a reconsideration of a decision which denied his claim for a retroactive temporary promotion and backpay. The employee claimed that he performed the duties of a higher graded position for a continuous 10-month period. However, he did not provide evidence that it was a continuous period. The employing activity claimed that no period during the months in question exceede...

DIGEST: EMPLOYEE WAS DETAILED TO HIGHER LEVEL POSITION ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS FOR VARYING PERIODS. HE IS ONLY ENTITLED TO RETROACTIVE TEMPORARY PROMOTION FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL DETAIL WHICH LASTED FOR MORE THAN 120 DAYS. EACH DETAIL IS TREATED AS A SEPARATE AND DISTINCT PERSONNEL ACTION. SR. - DETAIL TO HIGHER GRADE POSITION: THIS ACTION IS TAKEN PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE DENIAL...

IS ALLOWED. NO EXCLUSION FOR FIRST 120 DAYS OF DETAIL IS NECESSARY SINCE EXCLUSION OF 120 DAYS WAS MADE IN CONNECTION WITH PRIOR AWARD OF BACK PAY FOR PERIOD FROM AUGUST 1. JACKSON'S CLAIM IS ALLOWED FOR THE PERIOD OF DECEMBER 8. THE SUBSTANCE OF THE NEW EVIDENCE PRESENTED IS AS FOLLOWS. JACKSON WAS EMPLOYED AT KELLY AIR FORCE BASE. THE CLAIM WAS DENIED BECAUSE IT WAS THE AIR FORCE'S POSITION THAT...