B-193299:
Mar 29, 1979
A firm lodged a double protest. First, the protester alleged that its bid should not have been rejected as nonresponsive; and second, it protested the awards made to two other bidders on the grounds that their bids were nonresponsive. The protester's bid was properly determined nonresponsive as the descriptive literature furnished in the bid indicated that the equipment had a fixed crank control,...