Soldier v. United States: Damages From Alleged Failure of Agency To Mail Allotment Properly

B-192950: Oct 27, 1978

Additional Materials:


Julie Matta
(202) 512-4023


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO was asked to provide a report on the petition filed on September 14, 1978 in the case of a soldier v. the United States. The petitioner seeks damages stemming from the alleged failure of the United States Army Finance Center to properly mail his Class E allotment.

There is no record of any claim having been filed in the General Accounting Office, and GAO has no information concerning the facts in the case other than the allegations made in the petition. 

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.
  • Yang Enterprises, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here