Skip to main content

Alleged Nonresponsive Bid from Competitor

B-189520 Sep 16, 1977
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

The protester alleged that the low bidder's bid was nonresponsive since it failed to indicate compliance with the requirement that the contractor's forces perform at least 15 percent of the actual construction work. The bid was responsive despite the fact that the bidder placed a zero in the space for "services," since the bidder was bound to comply with the invitation-for-bids provisions which it acknowledged by signing the bid.

Downloads

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs