B-188832,B-188846: May 23, 1977

A potential employee on a contract objected to the award of the contract to a competitor. As a general policy, GAO will not develop bid protests filed by potential employees of a disappointed bidder or offeror where the bidder or offeror itself does not protest...

B-188832,B-188846: Jul 26, 1977

FACT THAT PROTESTER MAY BE A POTENTIAL EMPLOYEE OF OFFEROR IF AWARDED CONTRACT IS INSUFFICIENT REASON TO REGARD PROTESTER AS "INTERESTED PARTY." 2. GAO WILL NOT CONSIDER PROTESTS FILED BY POTENTIAL EMPLOYEE OF DISAPPOINTED BIDDER OR OFFEROR WHERE BIDDER OR OFFEROR ITSELF DOES NOT PROTEST. 3. PROTEST THAT CONTRACTOR IS NOT PERFORMING INVOLVES MATTER OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION WHICH IS RESPONSIBILIT...

B-188832,B-188846: May 23, 1977

GAO WILL NOT DEVELOP BID PROTEST FILED BY POTENTIAL EMPLOYEE OF DISAPPOINTED BIDDER OR OFFEROR WHERE BIDDER OR OFFEROR ITSELF DOES NOT PROTEST. A PROTEST WAS RECEIVED FROM JOHN S. IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING FROM UTHSC THAT DR. CONNOLLY DOES NOT REPRESENT UTHSC AND IS PROTESTING ONLY AS A POTENTIAL EMPLOYEE. PROTESTS HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED BY OUR OFFICE WHICH WERE FILED BY A LABOR UNION. WE HAVE STATED...

B-188832,B-188846: Jul 26, 1977

A potential employee of a bidder on an Air Force contract protested the award of the contract to another offeror. That the protester might be a potential employee of the offeror if awarded the contract was insufficient reason to regard the protester as an interested party. GAO will not consider protests filed by a potential employee of a disappointed bidder or offeror where the bidder or offeror i...