OR THAT PROPOSAL SHOULD BE CONSIDERED NOTWITHSTANDING THAT IT WAS LATE IS DENIED. IT IS CONCEDED THAT FALCON'S PROPOSAL NEITHER WAS RECEIVED BY THE ARMY BY JANUARY 31. NOR WAS POSTED BY CERTIFIED MAIL MORE THAN FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THAT DATE. WHICH WOULD HAVE INSURED ITS CONSIDERATION. FALCON ARGUES THAT THIS CASE IS UNUSUAL. NOTING THAT THIS IS A PROCUREMENT. " IT CONTENDS THAT ITS PROPOSAL SHOULD...

The protester alleged that the Army abused its discretion in refusing to extend the date of receipt for proposals because of severe weather conditions. No basis was found for questioning the reasonableness of the Army's refusal to extend the closing date...