A protest was made to the timing of a contract award, and protester contended that there was racial prejudice on the part of agency officials, that their technical proposal was superior to that of awardee, and that their alternate proposal was not considered. No evidence was furnished substantiating allegation of racial prejudice by agency officials. Point spread in technical evaluation was close...

WHERE CONFUSION EXISTS AS TO THE MEANING OF THE TERM "DATE OF AWARD" IT IS SUGGESTED. PROTESTER HAS NOT FURNISHED ANY EVIDENCE SUBSTANTIATING ITS ALLEGATION THAT IT WAS THE SUBJECT OF RACIAL PREJUDICE OF AGENCY OFFICIALS. 3. RFP-13 WAS. THERE HUMANICS ASSERTED THAT THE EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSALS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THE SOLICITATIONS WAS NOT CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES SET OUT...