There was no legal basis to preclude or disturb contract award for janitorial services merely because low bidder may have submitted bid which the protester believed was too low and therefore "nonresponsive." Therefore, protest raising that sole issue was dismissed...

The protester objected to the award of a contract, alleging that the price offered by the successful bidder was too low and that the bid was nonresponsive because the bid price would not allow performance of the contract. There was no legal basis to preclude or disturb the contract award merely because the low bidder may have submitted a bid which the protester believed was too low. The possibilit...

THERE IS NO LEGAL BASIS TO PRECLUDE OR DISTURB CONTRACT AWARD MERELY BECAUSE LOW BIDDER MAY HAVE SUBMITTED BID WHICH PROTESTER BELIEVES IS TOO LOW. 2. MATTER IS NOT CONSIDERED PURSUANT TO BID PROTEST FUNCTION BEYOND ADVISING PROCURING AGENCY OF POSSIBLE MISTAKE FOR VERIFICATION PURPOSES. THE PROTESTER CLAIMS THAT THE GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS BID IS TOO LOW AND "OBVIOUSLY TOTALLY NON-RESPONSIVE" INAS...