https://www.gao.gov/products/098665

B-185791: Aug 18, 1976

The protester objected to the award of a contract to the highest technically rated offerer, who was also highest in price, and complained that it did not receive adequate consideration as a small business. There was no basis to object to the award since the solicitation evaluation criteria advised offerers that price was of secondary consideration, and the record indicated that offerers were evalu...

https://www.gao.gov/products/481127

B-185791: Aug 18, 1976

WHERE RFP EVALUATION CRITERIA ADVISED OFFERORS THAT PRICE WAS OF SECONDARY CONSIDERATION. REVIEW OF EVALUATION REPORT SHOWS OFFERORS WERE EVALUATED ON EQUAL BASIS AND PROTESTER'S ALLEGATION THAT EVALUATION OF ITS EXPERIENCE WAS ARBITRARY IS FOUND TO BE WITHOUT MERIT. 2. PROTEST BY SMALL BUSINESS OFFEROR THAT IT DID NOT RECEIVE ADEQUATE CONSIDERATION AS SMALL BUSINESS IS DENIED AS THERE IS NO REQUI...