The report you requested was not found, or there is more than one product with this report number. Please select from this list of similar report numbers.


B-185605, JUL 1, 1976

B-185605: Jul 1, 1976

DISCREPANCY BETWEEN REQUIREMENTS OF SOLICITATION IS NOT "MINOR INCONSISTENCY" WHERE REQUIREMENTS READ TOGETHER COULD REASONABLY LEAD PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS TO DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS REGARDING MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH BIDS. BID PRICE SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS ARE DEFICIENT WHICH WOULD REASONABLY LEAD BIDDERS TO ASSUME THAT "DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATED" BID COULD BE EXPRESSED AS TOTAL ALTERNATIVE BID PRICE...

B-185605, JUL 22, 1976

B-185605: Jul 22, 1976

DECISION IS AFFIRMED. THIS FAILURE TO MEET THE STANDARD FOR RECONSIDERATION WHICH WE HAVE RECENTLY REITERATED IN SHIPPERS PACKAGING AND CONTAINER CORPORATION - REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION. BEING AN INTERESTED PARTY IN ITS ROLE AS THE PROSPECTIVE RECIPIENT OF THE AWARD WAS TWICE AFFORDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO PLACE DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD UPON WHICH OUR ORIGINAL DECISION WAS BASED. IS AFFIR...

Reconsideration of Prior Decision Recommending Cancellation and Resolicitation

B-185605: Jul 22, 1976

A company requested reconsideration of a decision recommending cancellation and resolicitation of the procurement. The prior decision was affirmed because no new facts or errors of law were demonstrated...
Protest Involving Solicitation Deficiencies

B-185605: Jul 1, 1976

A company protested award to any firm other than itself on the bases of deficiencies in the solicitation and bid evaluation. The following deficiencies were noted: a discrepancy in bid submission requirements of the solicitation which could lead bidders to different conclusions was not a "minor inconsistency"; bid price submission instructions were deficient; award on an alternate bid basis would...