Untimely Protest Against Rejection of Proposal as Technically Unacceptable

B-185352: Feb 12, 1976

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

The protester objected to the agency's determination that its proposal was technically unacceptable and, therefore, not within the competitive range. The protest, which was not filed with either the agency or GAO within 10 working days after the basis of the protest was known, was untimely and not for consideration on its merits.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here