Protest Regarding Evaluation of Price Proposals

B-184697: Feb 12, 1976

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A protester objected to the agency's evaluation of the bid sumbitted by another offerer, contending that the note submitted with the bid qualified the bid with two unit prices. The contracting officer properly interpreted the note attached to the bid as not offering two prices for the same item of work but as offering two prices for work to be performed under two different factual circumstances. The bid was correctly evaluated by disregarding that portion of the note contingent upon circumstances not present in the procurement and using the price in the portion of the note which corresponded to the facts of the procurement for the evaluation.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here