The protester objected to the award of a contract, alleging that it was the low offerer and that its proposal should have been determined to be within the competitive range. Since there was no evidence of unreasonableness on the part of the agency in utilizing the technical evaluation of the protester's proposal to place the proposal in the unacceptable category, there was no basis for objecting t...

NO BASIS IS FOUND TO OBJECT TO AWARD TO LOWEST -PRICED ACCEPTABLE PROPOSER. N00189-75-R-0139 WAS ISSUED BY THE NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND. THE CLOSING DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS AS AMENDED WAS MARCH 27. WAS ONE OF 12 FIRMS THAT SUBMITTED A PROPOSAL. THE TECHNICAL PROPOSALS WERE TO BE EVALUATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A PREDETERMINED EVALUATION PLAN WHICH CORRESPONDED TO THE FOUR EVALUATION FACTORS...