B-183379: Jun 30, 1975

WAS EXCLUDED FROM COMPETITIVE RANGE FOR SUBSTANTIAL INFORMATIONAL DEFICIENCIES AND MERE "PARROTING" OF FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT EVALUATORS COULD NOT ANALYZE WHAT WAS BEING PROPOSED WITHOUT REQUESTING MAJOR REVISIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PROPOSAL. 2. WHERE ONLY ONE PROPOSAL IS IN COMPETITIVE RANGE. AGENCY TECHNICAL EVALUATION WILL BE SCRUTINIZED TO DETERMINE IF (1) THERE IS CLOSE QUESTION OF AC...

B-183379: Jun 30, 1975

The protester objected to the rejection of its proposal as technically unacceptable and to the agency's refusal to accept additional information after the evaluation of proposals. The agency did not violate the requirement to conduct discussions with all offerers in the competitive range because the protester's proposal was excluded from the competitive range for substantial information deficienci...