https://www.gao.gov/products/095371

B-182971: Feb 6, 1975

The protester alleged that it was improper for the agency to recall its award and to resolicit the procurement under a new solicitation after the protester's price had been exposed. The protest, filed about 4 months after the closing date for receipt of proposals under the resolicitation, was untimely and not for consideration...

https://www.gao.gov/products/459761

B-182971: Feb 6, 1975

PROTEST AGAINST RESOLICITATION OF PROCUREMENT FILED NEARLY 4 MONTHS AFTER CLOSING DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS UNDER RESOLICITATION IS UNTIMELY UNDER BID PROTEST PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS AND IS NOT FOR CONSIDERATION. IT PROTESTED TO OUR OFFICE AGAINST THE AWARD TO ANOTHER CONCERN AFTER THE AWARD TO NYTEK WAS RECALLED. THE LAW FIRM WAS ADVISED THAT THE PROTEST WOULD BE PROCESSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH...