B-171281: Jul 17, 1972

THE CLAIM WAS DENIED BECAUSE NO APPLICATION FOR REEMPLOYMENT WAS SHOWN TO HAVE BEEN MADE. HARDY TO THE EFFECT THAT WHILE HE WAS AN EMPLOYEE IN THE EMPLOYMENT OFFICE OF THE U.S. SINCE IT WAS NOT MADE UNTIL MORE THAN 5 YEARS AFTER THE TIME CLAIMANT ALLEGEDLY APPLIED FOR REEMPLOYMENT. THIS EVIDENCE IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO OVERCOME THE PRESUMPTION THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT. IS CORRECT. THE CLAIM IS...

B-171281: Mar 3, 1971

WHO WAS ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY AS A RESERVIST CAN ESTABLISH THAT HE MADE ATTEMPTS TO BE RESTORED TO HIS FORMER POSITION. MORRIS: THIS IS IN REFERENCE TO YOUR LETTERS DATED OCTOBER 15 AND 30. YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED BY SETTLEMENT DATED OCTOBER 21. FOR THE REASON THAT THE RECORD DID NOT ESTABLISH THAT YOU WERE REFUSED RESTORATION UNDER 5 U.S.C. 3551 BY THE NAVAL AIR STATION NOR THAT YOU WERE REEMP...

B-171281: Published: Oct 5, 1972. Publicly Released: Oct 5, 1972.

No summary is currently available...