The report you requested was not found, or there is more than one product with this report number. Please select from this list of similar report numbers.


B-168691, JUL 13, 1970, 50 COMP GEN 22

B-168691: Jul 13, 1970

1970: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED OCTOBER 7. YOUR REQUEST WAS ACCOMPANIED BY COMMENTS DATED NOVEMBER 5. WAS ORDERED TO REPORT IMMEDIATELY TO THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY FOR DUTY AS ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR CIVIL LAW. WAS ORDERED TO REPORT TO THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY FOR DUTY AS ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR MILITARY LAW AND FOR ADDITIO...

B-168691, JULY 14, 1975, 55 COMP.GEN. 58

B-168691: Jul 14, 1975

204 CT.CL. 675 HELD THAT NAVAL OFFICERS ORDERED TO SERVE IN POSITIONS OF ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATES GENERAL ARE ENTITLED TO AS LEAST THE PAY OF A REAR ADMIRAL (LOWER HALF) WHILE SERVING IN SUCH POSITIONS WHETHER THEY WERE "DETAILED" OR "ASSIGNED" TO SUCH POSITIONS. OUR DECISION AT 50 COMP.GEN. 22 WHICH DETERMINED THAT SUCH OFFICERS WERE NOT ENTITLED TO PAY OF REAR ADMIRAL (LOWER HALF) WILL NO LONGE...

Pay of Assistant Judge Advocates General of the Navy

B-168691: Jul 14, 1975

An advance decision was requested concerning the entitlement of naval officers serving in the positions of Assistant Judge Advocates General of the Navy to receive the pay of a rear admiral (lower half). The Court of Claims ruled in 1974 that such naval officers were entitled to at least the pay of a rear admiral (lower half) while serving in such positions whether they were "detailed" or "assigne...